Last night, I decided to attend the 5:30 a.m. Bootcamp class at the 24hourfitness at post oak (the 24hourfitness with a valet parking). Since the only way to be up at 5:30 a.m., is to be up all night, I spent the whole night listening to lectures on Great Ideas in Philosophy by Dr. Daniel Robinson. (I didn’t bother to remember his credentials. My reasoning and logic, I believe, are enough for me to judge the validity of any form of knowledge).
After listening to these lectures, in the dark dawning sky of 5:30 a.m., I wondered the philosophical implications of two things:
1. Death of Socrates
2. Psychology of the people who attend Bootcamp classes at 5:30 am in the morning.
I am assuming that the death of Socrates is of higher importance. But to cut it short, philosophically, people who wake up at 5 in the morning to go to bootcamp classes belong to the one kind of people who will never get to their weight reduction goals (unless they are bipolar, have BPD or are simply depressed), because there is no way anyone can maintain any sort of regularity with this sort of extremity, and weight reduction is all about regularity. The more casual you are about it, the higher chances of you being regular at it. There, I said it. Stop torturing yourself people. Wake up like normal human beings at 8 am and just workout regularly for an hour. It was more psychological than philosophical but, hell, the two aren’t THAT far away from each other.
Now let’s come to the death of Socrates.
There was something definitely genius about Socrates. He brought to Philosophy the science of validation of truth. There are only two ways in which you can validate a truth- either you prove it by mathematics, or you prove it by experimentation, and you cannot prove the entire truth in either way. Socrates gave birth to this thought and I admire him for that.
Obviously, Socrates saw order in things that people did not (all geniuses do actually). He never rationalized in his arguments and nothing impressed him more than pure reason. He wasn’t a practical man, and yet he understood practicality better than any man. Unlike so many philosophers, he understood the implications of his claims and he was strict with his assumptions. His logic was never circular, and he always made sure that he eliminates the possibility of such arguments. But, somewhere from within, Socrates was a depressed man.
I say this because Socrates, THE great Socrates- the thinker, the arguer, the promoter of debates, the father of logic and reason- lost the argument of his life, not to logic and reason, or an impartial matter of justice, but to an illogical, irrational, and unlawful enemy. He did not live for the lies, but died to defend the inaccuracy of a law that he worked so hard to make.
He rationalized his death to his friends. He said, “If today I shun from my death, then everything that I have fought for, everything that I have argued about will mean nothing. My life will mean nothing.”
He claimed that his death will establish the value of law & order, that, it will show to the world that even Socrates, the giver of law and politics, is not above law. But, if you look at it carefully, you will see that ultimately, he died not for the law itself, but for the inaccuracy and injustice of law.
Law that follows the rules so blindly that it accuses an innocent, cannot be right. It’s just like saying, casually,”Ohh! Life is not fair. Deal with it.”
Well, when it comes to matters of life and death, we humans cannot afford to be unfair, otherwise law, instead of becoming a philosopher’s stone for evaluating circumstances and people, will (has?) become nothing but a pawn in the hands of quirky, irrational, and emotionally driven unstable people. No matter how rational the laws are, if the followers/its keepers are of the latter type (the emotionally driven unstable types) then law becomes meaningless; it becomes a tool for tyranny, which is ironical, because after all, law is to help people fight tyranny, fight for the only human law that matter and states that no one man can take away the freedom of any other man unless logic and reason support it.
Socrates’s sacrifice proved nothing except that law can be wrong in its assessment of people, and that law, indeed can become an accessory to tyrannical injustice. It would have been fine if that was the reason Socrates gave for his death. But, he wanted to establish the “correctness” of law and order through his death.
Socrates was a cool rationalist, there is no doubt about it. For a person who spends his entire life searching for truth, and then dying to instate the ascendancy of lies is rather contradictory. I am sure, as a cool rationalist, he’d have seen that.
The only reason left is that he was depressed, and I have an explanation.
For Socrates, truth was everything. According to him, the ultimate goal of man was to prepare for his death. His death wasn’t a teenage suicide though; he wasn’t frustrated with his puberty and thus, one day, decided to end it all. His depression was the one that arises from disinterest- a subtle attribute of people genuinely and unknowingly looking for the ultimate truth (by genuine I mean no saints, or Gautam Buddha plz). His reasons were buried deeper in his loneliness; in the truth that he had learned about the universe, that, no matter how logical man may become, he will never be able to see the truth in its entirety. Nothing can be more painful for a person who has devoted his entire life in the pursuit of truth- the truth that denies the possibility knowing all of the truth.
Socrates’s suicide, even as a result of his depression, was in essence, the culmination of his work. There was nothing for him to learn or know more, which gave rise to a disconnectedness from life, which in turn gave rise to his desire to not live anymore.
Nevertheless, whatever the reasons may be, Socrates’s death was important. Because in life or in death, he had actually stumbled across the basis of everything- “The truth, no matter how trivial it maybe, will never be known in its entirety”; and evolved over centuries, the greatest feat of mankind- mathematics, has proved exactly his[Socrates] point.
P.S.: there are so many sidelines that arise in this topic that I might need a book to explain it all. But I am not a philosopher, and I definitely haven’t learned enough in life to write a literary article or book about ultimate truth. I believe that the reasoning I have given in my post is enough to ascertain the real reason for Socrates’s death. On the other hand, several questions still remain unanswered and I am certain that I cannot answer them today.